Disinformation in Scientific News in Bulgarian
Published Sunday 11 October 2026 at 09:31

The article by Ruslana Margova examines how pseudoscientific and misleading narratives are embedded in Bulgarian-language science communication. The study analyzes 17,833 posts from Bulgarian public Facebook pages and groups published between 2014 and 2024, collected via CrowdTangle, alongside 498 science-related news articles from early 2026. The methodology combines TF-IDF and n-gram analysis, a specialized lexicon of pseudoscientific markers, expert validation, and thematic clustering using ChatGPT-4o.
A key finding is that 17.68% of the analyzed social media posts contain lexical markers associated with pseudoscientific or disinformation discourse. The most prominent thematic cluster, labelled “Bulgaria Above All – The Most Ancient,” appears in 55.27% of the identified pseudoscientific content. Other major themes include “energy” and “quantum” narratives (40.32%), health and alternative medicine (34.49%), and conspiracy theories and “hidden truths” (32.42%). These categories overlap and therefore the percentages should not be added together.
One of the article’s central observations is the strong connection between pseudoscience and national identity and narratives of historical exceptionalism. Examples include claims about the extraordinary antiquity or uniqueness of Bulgarians and sensationalized accounts of supposedly Bulgarian scientific discoveries. The study also identifies a pattern of pseudo-expertise, in which scientific-sounding terms such as quantum, energy, and frequency are transferred into astrological, esoteric, or otherwise non-scientific contexts.
The comparison between different media environments suggests that social media is more strongly associated with emotional, national-identity, and conspiratorial narratives, whereas the news corpus contains more horoscopes, alternative medicine, and sensationalized representations of scientific topics.
An important methodological contribution is the comparison with ChatGPT-4o. While the model successfully identifies broad themes such as health misinformation, conspiracy theories, and esoteric uses of scientific terminology, it does not identify the specifically Bulgarian nationalist narrative as a dominant category. The author interprets this as a potential “cultural blind spot” in general-purpose LLMs, highlighting the value of combining AI-assisted analysis with locally developed linguistic resources and expert validation.
Suggested citation
Margova, Ruslana. 2026. “Detecting Pseudoscientific Narratives in Bulgarian Science Communication: Nationalistic Mystification, Pseudo-Expertise and Cultural Blind Spots in AI-Assisted Analysis.” Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Computational Linguistics in Bulgaria (CLIB 2026), 228–237. Sofia, Bulgaria: Department of Computational Linguistics, Institute for Bulgarian Language, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences.
Article: Full-text PDF
Proceedings: CLIB Conference Proceedings